"Geoengineering: Assessing the Implications of Large-Scale Climate Intervention" OR better known as "deliberate large scale modification of the earth's climate system".
Again, we would like to remind our readers we as humans need carbon dioxide to live. Carbon dioxide is released from the body when organisms breathe out, or exhale. Plants need carbon dioxide to make their own food, and they release oxygen in the process. ... During this process, the organisms release oxygen into the air. Many living things (humans) get oxygen from the air when they breathe in, or inhale.
Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.
gov_info_the_lies_chrg-111hhrg53007.pdf | |
File Size: | 14642 kb |
File Type: |
Carbon is a chemical element, and a pretty common one. It's the sixth most common element in the universe and the 15th most common one in the Earth's crust. Unlike a lot of other chemical elements, you can actually see some forms of carbon. Diamonds are one form of carbon, as is the graphite in the pencil you used in chemistry class when learning this stuff the first time around. But, the Earth isn't storing most of its carbon in diamonds and pencils -- no matter how much the jewelry and education industries might hope for that. Amorphous carbon is a third form of carbon, and it's a lot harder to see since, unlike diamonds and graphite, it doesn't have a crystalline structure.
So, where is all this carbon hiding out? Look in the mirror. Carbon is the building block for all life on Earth (which is why Captain Kirk and NASA are always looking for carbon-based life forms on other planets), and a good chunk of the total amount of it that the Earth has is in living and dead organic molecules. That means it's not only in you and your dog, but also in things like fossil fuels and road kill. Carbon is also found in the atmosphere where it's a part of carbon dioxide gas emitted when fossil fuels are burned and when living organisms breathe. It's in organic matter in the soil, and it's in rocks.
But far and away the most carbon on Earth is stored in a surprising place: the ocean. There's estimated to be 38,000 to 40,000 billion metric tons of carbon in the ocean itself with a whopping 66 million to 100 million-billion metric tons of carbon in marine sediments and sedimentary rocks. Those sediments and rocks develop from the hard shells and body parts of marine organisms that have absorbed the carbon in the water. When they die, their bodies sink to the ocean floor, and the hard parts break down into sediment, which later are formed into sedimentary rocks.
So, where is all this carbon hiding out? Look in the mirror. Carbon is the building block for all life on Earth (which is why Captain Kirk and NASA are always looking for carbon-based life forms on other planets), and a good chunk of the total amount of it that the Earth has is in living and dead organic molecules. That means it's not only in you and your dog, but also in things like fossil fuels and road kill. Carbon is also found in the atmosphere where it's a part of carbon dioxide gas emitted when fossil fuels are burned and when living organisms breathe. It's in organic matter in the soil, and it's in rocks.
But far and away the most carbon on Earth is stored in a surprising place: the ocean. There's estimated to be 38,000 to 40,000 billion metric tons of carbon in the ocean itself with a whopping 66 million to 100 million-billion metric tons of carbon in marine sediments and sedimentary rocks. Those sediments and rocks develop from the hard shells and body parts of marine organisms that have absorbed the carbon in the water. When they die, their bodies sink to the ocean floor, and the hard parts break down into sediment, which later are formed into sedimentary rocks.
Our government actually has some concerns about their actions and those of others they can't control!
FROM THE HEARINGS ABOVE:
DR. CALDEIRA: (On Geoengineering & Climate Stimulation) - "In terms of experiments, so far no experiments have gone on in the field, but we could think of process-based experiments. You know, you put some materials into the stratosphere, what kind of chemical reactions would occur?" (You don't know Sir?) "We need to think carefully about how to go about conducting these experiments. (I think they missed the boat.)
Rep. Suzanne M. Kosmas (D-FL) is the former U.S. Rep. from FL from 2009 until 2011. She is a member of the Democratic Party. (On NASA's Role) - "I know it has been suggested that the NSF and DARPA should be agencies involved in this, but could you tell me your feelings about NASA being involved in these projects? Dr. Robock responds they are already using some of NASA's equipment and that they need to be involved." Mr. Rohrabacher (D-CA) (former CA House of Rep) responds: Thank you Mr. Chairman, and no hearing like this would be fulfilled without my adding a
|
list at this point of 100 top scientists from around the world who are very skeptical of the very fact that global warming exists at all, but I would like to submit that to the record at this time. And within the report following his statement on page 92 is a list of those 100 scientists.
List of more than 100 Scientists Who Agree That:
The conversation that follows from the bottom of page 95 - 102 is extremely interesting and I love the most the remark on page 96 by Mr. Rohrbacher regarding "the fact the "pro-climate change people" are now used the words "climate change" rather than their use of the words global warming 10 years previous. And most of US realize that is because people now are trying to hedge their bets so they can have these controls, whatever way the temperature goes".
List of more than 100 Scientists Who Agree That:
- The case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated;
- Surface temperature changes over the past century has been episodic and modest;
- There has been no net global warming for over a decade;
- The computer models forecasting rapid temperature change abjectly fail to explain recent climate behavior; and
- Characterization of the scientific facts regrading climate change and the degree of certainty informing the scientific debate is simply incorrect.
- These scientists are from all over the world!
The conversation that follows from the bottom of page 95 - 102 is extremely interesting and I love the most the remark on page 96 by Mr. Rohrbacher regarding "the fact the "pro-climate change people" are now used the words "climate change" rather than their use of the words global warming 10 years previous. And most of US realize that is because people now are trying to hedge their bets so they can have these controls, whatever way the temperature goes".
Page 187 is interesting with Mr. Rohrbacher speaking on the "Skepticism of Climate Change."