THEY TRULY BELIEVED SHE WOULD WIN!
Most would agree that President Donald Trump is an "imperfect figure who can annoy plenty of people," but he's smart and has been a "disrupter" who got in the way of the NWO/OWG or whatever you want to call it.
|
|
|
A LETTER FROM THE KEEPERS
How You are Being Controlled Without Knowing It!
Rev 20:8 And (he Satan) shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.
| a_letter_from_the_keepers.pdf |
This is taking the evil part of the New World Order and read this as if the "bad guys" are telling you their goals and how they plan to destroy the rest of us.
NO MATTER WHAT YOU CALL IT - NEW WORLD ORDER - ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT or as McCAIN refered to it as the 'WEST" - LEARN!
AMERICA'S SUPER RICH TO RUN THE WORLD
Wake Up and Smell the Danger Folks
|
New Order of Barbarians by Dr. Richard Day - all 4 tapes in one- he gave this originally in 1969
|
Dr. Day's speech recalled - Keep in mind Dr. Day went on to head up Planned Parenthood!
|
THE DON BELL REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1972
REPORTED ON A WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE on the Industrial World held February 7 of that year. The conference title was “A Look at Business in 1990.” Excerpts follow:
As one of the participants in that conference, Roy Ash, President of Litton Industries and Chairman of the President’s Advisory Council on Executive Organization, later appeared before the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce to tell West Coast businessmen what was decided at the White House Conference. The billing for this latter event is impressive reading: The Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the White House Staff, is presenting The White House Conference, The World Ahead: A Look at Business in 1990, Thursday, May 18, 1972. Los Angeles Hilton 3:00–6:30 p.m.
Following is part of what Roy Ash told his Los Angeles audience:
The answer is that increasing economic and business interdependence among nations is the keynote of the next two decades of world business—decades that will see major steps toward a single world economy....
Some aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to international authority.... As importantly, international agreements between the socialist and the private property economies add a different dimension to the problems for which solutions need to be found over the years ahead. But as Jean Frere, Managing Partner of Banque Lambert, Brussels, forecasts, the socialist countries will take major steps toward joining the world economy by 1990. He goes so far as to see them becoming members of the International Monetary Fund, the sine qua non for effective participation in multilateral commerce.
Then also, by 1990 an imaginative variety of contractual arrangements will have been devised and put into operation by which the socialist countries and the private capital countries will be doing considerable business together, neither being required to abandon its base idea....
These powerful factors of production—that is, capital, technology and management-- will be fully mobile, neither contained nor containable within national borders.... As a framework for their [multinational corporations] development and application will be the establishment of more effective supranational institutions to deal with intergovernmental matters and matters between governments and world industry. A key intergovernmental institution that needs to work well in a world economy is the International Monetary Fund. The IMF will become, in Robert Roosa’s [Brown Bros. Harriman & Co.] words, the most advanced embodiment of the aspirations that so many have for a world society, a world economy. The IMF, he forecasts for 1990, is going to be the source of all of the primary reserves of all the banking systems of the world....
For, in the final analysis, we are commanded by the fact that the economies of the major countries of the world will be interlocked. And since major economic matters in all countries are also important political matters in and between countries, the inevitable consequence of these propositions in that the broader and total destinies—economic, political, and social—of all the world’s nations are closely interlocked. We are clearly at that point where economic issues and their related effects can be considered only in terms of a total world destiny, not just separate national destinies, and certainly not just a separate go-it-alone destiny for the United States.
As one of the participants in that conference, Roy Ash, President of Litton Industries and Chairman of the President’s Advisory Council on Executive Organization, later appeared before the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce to tell West Coast businessmen what was decided at the White House Conference. The billing for this latter event is impressive reading: The Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the White House Staff, is presenting The White House Conference, The World Ahead: A Look at Business in 1990, Thursday, May 18, 1972. Los Angeles Hilton 3:00–6:30 p.m.
Following is part of what Roy Ash told his Los Angeles audience:
The answer is that increasing economic and business interdependence among nations is the keynote of the next two decades of world business—decades that will see major steps toward a single world economy....
Some aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to international authority.... As importantly, international agreements between the socialist and the private property economies add a different dimension to the problems for which solutions need to be found over the years ahead. But as Jean Frere, Managing Partner of Banque Lambert, Brussels, forecasts, the socialist countries will take major steps toward joining the world economy by 1990. He goes so far as to see them becoming members of the International Monetary Fund, the sine qua non for effective participation in multilateral commerce.
Then also, by 1990 an imaginative variety of contractual arrangements will have been devised and put into operation by which the socialist countries and the private capital countries will be doing considerable business together, neither being required to abandon its base idea....
These powerful factors of production—that is, capital, technology and management-- will be fully mobile, neither contained nor containable within national borders.... As a framework for their [multinational corporations] development and application will be the establishment of more effective supranational institutions to deal with intergovernmental matters and matters between governments and world industry. A key intergovernmental institution that needs to work well in a world economy is the International Monetary Fund. The IMF will become, in Robert Roosa’s [Brown Bros. Harriman & Co.] words, the most advanced embodiment of the aspirations that so many have for a world society, a world economy. The IMF, he forecasts for 1990, is going to be the source of all of the primary reserves of all the banking systems of the world....
For, in the final analysis, we are commanded by the fact that the economies of the major countries of the world will be interlocked. And since major economic matters in all countries are also important political matters in and between countries, the inevitable consequence of these propositions in that the broader and total destinies—economic, political, and social—of all the world’s nations are closely interlocked. We are clearly at that point where economic issues and their related effects can be considered only in terms of a total world destiny, not just separate national destinies, and certainly not just a separate go-it-alone destiny for the United States.
DON BELL'S PROOF OF THE CONSPIRACY TO BUILD A MANAGED GLOBAL SOCIETY
ENEMIES FROM WITHIN - TREASON for SURE!
The thoughts and plans for a New World Order (NWO) began a long time ago by men whose ego's had overtaken their thought processes and reason. Ego's had replaced these and they were patient in their plans - slowly and deliberately inching along to especially destroy the United States and in the process create a ruling world for themselves.
Woodrow Wilson first addressed this agenda in his Founrteen Points speech and in a call for a League of Nations following the devastation of World War I. The phrase was used sparingly at the end of World War II when describing the plans for the United Nations and the Bretton Woods system, and partly because of its negative associations with the failed League of Nations. However, many commentators have applied the term retroactively to the order put in place by the World War II victors as a "new world order."
|
|
Wilson believed that with the League of Nations in place they would be the watcdog of the world to prevent any further wars - that was their "job" through collective security and disarmament with the settling of international disputes through negotiation and arbitration.Founded January 10, 1920 at the Paris Peace Conference, and after some successes and failures, the League ultimately proved to be unable/uncapable of preventing aggression. First Germany withdrew followed by Japan, Italy, Spain and others. With the onset of WWII, it showed the League was a failure and was shut down in early 1946 to be replaced by the United Nations at the end of WWII on April 20, 1946.
Keep in mind, despite Wilson's efforts to establish and promote the League for which he received the 1919 Nobel Peace Prize, Henry Cabot Lodge opposed the League in the Senate drawing enough support that the United States never joined the League mostly due to Article X of the Covenant.
ARTICLE 10.The Members of the League undertake to respect and preserve as against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing political independence of all Members of the League. In case of any such aggression or in case of any threat or danger of such aggression the Council shall advise upon the means by which this obligation shall be fulfilled.
Keep in mind, despite Wilson's efforts to establish and promote the League for which he received the 1919 Nobel Peace Prize, Henry Cabot Lodge opposed the League in the Senate drawing enough support that the United States never joined the League mostly due to Article X of the Covenant.
ARTICLE 10.The Members of the League undertake to respect and preserve as against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing political independence of all Members of the League. In case of any such aggression or in case of any threat or danger of such aggression the Council shall advise upon the means by which this obligation shall be fulfilled.
Joint Session of Congress September 11, 1990
September 11 seems to be a target date for the Bush family!
The plans for this union called the New World Order in the United States was first announced to the world by George H. W. Bush. The term as it was used was to reflect to a new period of history giving evidence of a dramatic change in the world political agenda and the balance of power - removing all authority from the American people. It was to be seen as a global governance on the world stage. Not using the words, the plans for this "union", first got its feet wet with the passage of NAFTA during the Clinton years with the full support of Newt Gingrich and the republicans he could convinence to climb aboard. It actually extended well into the George W. years as explained by Lou Dobbs in 2005.
THE RELEASE OF THE TRUTH OF THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION - BUSH LIES!
As the words leave their mouths in the form of lies -
they mearly grow!
As the words leave their mouths in the form of lies -
they mearly grow!
|
|
|
Interesting in regard to population control in the same memo they call to postpone/avoid marriage, increase homosexuality, encourage abortion and pay for their abortions. This document is not copyrighted per Planned Parenthood - World Population.
| nwo_and_planned_parenthood_population_control.jpg |
| paris_-_un_-_climate_change_redistribution_of_wealth.docx |
